Jimmie Killingsworth ([info]jimmiebluegoose) wrote,
@ 2006-01-25 10:37:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
What's cool
One crucial act of nerdism is to obsess over cool stuff. On the technological side, cool stuff is usually gadgets. A new program, a new game, a new tool. If it's cool, it demands your attention and nothing can get in the way.

For educators who think they can appeal to nerdism by making college courses into computer games, several problems arise. First, school is always decidedly uncool. Second, the educators themselves fall into a kind of nerdism and tend to get excited about their tools and then neglect what they wanted to teach in the first place.



(Post a new comment)

Counterexample
(Anonymous)
2006-01-27 02:59 am UTC (link)
Dr. Killingsworth, although I am able to see how this problem with courses surrounding video games may arise, I would like to offer a counterexample. Dr. Dennis G. Jerz was an undergraduate mentor of mine who enlightened me about technical writing, hypertext, usability, and new media as our interactions continue to this day through blogging. Anyway, he is teaching EL 250: Video Gaming at Seton Hill University, a course that contextualizes video games as Interactive Fiction with new media and he is getting a positive response from students who say they want to be there. BK

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Counterexample
(Anonymous)
2006-02-17 05:08 pm UTC (link)
I wonder though, BK, if Dr. Jerz's class is an exception, for it sounds like a special topics course. I understand the initial problem as mentioned by Dr. Killingsworth to be classes (whether in the computer classroom or not) that are distracted by the desire to be "cool" by way of technology. And there is still the difficulty of helping students bridge the very different contexts of computers for fun and computers for academic purposes. SSpring

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Counterexample
(Anonymous)
2006-02-17 07:11 pm UTC (link)
SSpring, I don't believe Dr. Jerz's class is a one-time exception because he is consistently teaching courses on Interactive Fiction (text-based games) / Gaming (video games) alongside journalism and English courses. As one of his former students, I know that Dennis successfully bridges that gap between computers for fun and academic purposes, since he manages to take incoming freshman and turn them into IF programmers, web page designers, or bloggers over the course of one semester. Based on his success, I would say encouraging students to compose via computers through different mediums (web pages, blogs, wiki) may be a key component to continue bridging that gap.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Counterexample
(Anonymous)
2006-03-03 01:55 pm UTC (link)
BK: You miss the point. I'm not talking about courses that take video games as a topic for study—that retains the element of coolness, cool enough to study INSTEAD of physics or literature—but courses that try to incorporate cool technologies to study uncool topics like physics or literature. Bluegoose

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Counterexample
(Anonymous)
2006-03-03 02:44 pm UTC (link)
Whoops! As a Structuralist would say, then, I read it wrong. BK

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Counterexample
(Anonymous)
2006-03-03 06:30 pm UTC (link)
What are you considering "cool technologies"? Follow up: Does that mean you are opposed to people who teach using web pages, blogs, or online instructional handouts combined with traditional teaching methods? BK

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Counterexample
[info]jimmiebluegoose
2006-03-03 07:14 pm UTC (link)
BK, you're frustrating me, man. When I say "cool," I'm referring to the original entry "what's cool." I'm talking about educators who think they will make uncool subjects like literature or physics cool by turning their courses into video games. I'll have to write a better entry about this, I guess, since I'm so easy to misunderstand. Class websites, blogs, etc. are all fine by me. Even video games. I'm not "opposed" to anything. I'm simply saying that it's faulty reasoning to think that you can import the FORM of any cool technology and expect the coolness to rub off on whatever subject you're trying to teach. I get the feeling that you don't want to hear that so you're hearing something else instead. Bluegoose

(Reply to this) (Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…